Radiocarbon Dating of Dinosaur Fossils
Several tests were done by the University of Georgia using accelerator mass spectrometry. The age for all these fossils was found to be less than 50, years 1. This is not predicted by conventional evolutionary theory; and other discoveries have been made concerning dinosaurs who discovered carbon 14 dating fossils also are not predicted by evolutionary theory such as the discovery of soft tissue in bones that are not or are only partially fossilized.
Hugh Miller and others authored a paper detailing the results of carbon dating of dinosaur fossils which was presented at the Western Geophysics Meeting in Singapore, August However, the abstract of the Miller presentation was removed from the website for the conference. If the accepted ages of millions of years for dinosaurs were to be found to be in error, this would be a problem to evolution. The dinosaur dates reported below and discussed in the AOGS paper discussed throughout this article, who discovered carbon 14 dating fossils triceratops, hadrosaur, allosaurus, and acrocanthasaurs.
Below is a list of some dinosaur fossils and their dated ages from the Miller paper. Are the dates beyond the range of testing technology? No, the University of Georgia had extended the maximum limit up over 50, years, and the ages were all well below this. Are the ages still too old? After all, even though these ages are much younger than conventional ages, many creationists believe life on earth to be much younger than even the reported carbon ages of these dinosaur fossils.
This question will be dealt with in a later section of this article. Another question that might come up with respect to these studies is the issue of contamination. If young organic material became mixed with the dinosaur material that was carbon dated, then the younger material would skew the result to a younger age. Another report shows that a mosasaur was dated at about 24, years old 78 ; this result was blamed on bacterial contamination, though no bacteria were discovered.
Living animals take in carbon on a regular basis. After death, the animal no longer takes in any carbon nor any other kind of carbon. The carbon decays at a known rate, but since it is being replenished while the animal is alive, only after the animal dies is no carbon added. Given the initial amount of carbon, the decay rate, and the remaining amount of carbon in a fossil, the length of time it would take for the initial amount of carbon to decay to the amount measured as remaining in the fossil may be calculated.
Carbon decays with a half-life of about 5, years. So if an object contained 1, carbon atoms, after 5, years it should contain approximately half that many, or carbon atoms. There is one other pertinent point to be made about carbon dating, however. In fact, if the entire earth were solid carbon, in a million years so much would have decayed that there would not be even a single atom of carbon left.
Scientists have done studies which suggest that dinosaurs lived millions of years ago, but those dates were not arrived at by use of carbon dating methods. So, you might ask, why is this article about carbon dating of dinosaurs? That is the point. That statement would be true if the dinosaurs were really millions of years old. But, if they were not that old, merely thousands of years old, then carbon dating applied to dinosaur fossils might detect some carbon atoms.
Are dinosaurs only thousands of years old? These findings about dinosaur fossils are just a piece of the evidence indicating assumed ages are perhaps mistaken. Other pieces include carbon in diamonds, other soft tissue found in dinosaur fossils, and evidence that conventional dating methods are inaccurate. Diamonds supposedly formed even further back in the past than dinosaurs —over a billion years ago.
There is even less reason to expect to find carbon in them, but it has been found. Soft tissue normally will deteriorate over time. This is so contrary to conventional theory that the discovery met with disbelief at first. Lava that obviously flowed around a piece of wood, since the hardened lava has taken the shape of the wood, has been dated as having solidified millions of years before the wood existed.
The point here is that the evidence of carbon dating presented above is not the only evidence indicating that currently accepted dates for dinosaur and other fossils might be wrong. Experiments are replicated in the belief that increasing the number of results supporting a hypothesis increases the evidence for the hypothesis.
In a similar manner, the more evidence of young ages for dinosaur fossils, the more compelling the evidence in total becomes. Could the dinosaur ages now be said to be precisely what the carbon dating results indicated? Even this is too old for many creationists, who would expect them to be less than 6 to 10 thousand years old. Several factors may possibly account for this seeming who discovered carbon 14 dating fossils.
According to this theory, the proportion of carbon would have been higher due to the removal of much normal carbon. The increased humidity before the flood would have reduced the formation of carbon in the atmosphere, while the drier air after the flood would have allowed more carbon formation. This could make younger fossils yield dates greater than their actual age. Evidence of differing dates for parts of the same animal support the hypothesis that there was a change in the carbon concentration or in the decay rate.
One interesting observation is that rapidly-growing body parts, such as hair, would absorb carbon from most recent concentrations, while slower-growing body parts, such as bone or muscle, might contain concentrations of carbon based on levels of carbon existing at earlier times in the environment of the who discovered carbon 14 dating fossils. Therefore, evidence of differing carbon concentrations i.
We now will look to see if there is just such evidence. A frozen musk ox found at Fairbanks Creek, Alaska, had scalp muscle tissue 24, years old and hair 17, years old according to carbon dating. At least three other frozen animals, two mammoths and a mastodon, have been found with parts of their bodies with carbon ages who discovered carbon 14 dating fossils different from other parts or from surrounding plant life that perished with or shortly after the animals.